Which of the following is an example of a long-running, replicable program with measurable outcomes?

• A. A single 1-hour workshop.
• B. A series of quarterly talks.
• C. A one-off STEM day.
• D. A mentoring program that runs weekly over several months with measurable outcomes.

Answer: (D)

The idea being tested is building programs that can run over time in multiple cohorts, with a clear way to measure impact and a structure that can be repeated in different settings. A mentoring program that runs weekly over several months fits this best because it provides sustained engagement, allowing participants to develop skills and confidence through ongoing guidance. The regular schedule and defined duration help ensure consistency, which makes the program replicable—you can reuse the same mentorship framework, activities, and evaluation plan with new groups. Having measurable outcomes means you can track progress with concrete metrics (like attendance, skill gains, project outcomes, or changes in interest in STEM), making impact visible and reportable.

The other options don’t align as well with long-running, replicable, and measurable criteria. A single 1-hour workshop is just one session with limited time to build competencies. A series of quarterly talks may be repeatable but often lacks a structured, ongoing program and explicit evaluation tied to outcomes. A one-off STEM day is a single event with no ongoing engagement or consistent, evaluable results.